Comment Period Extended by SCWRCG to Aug. 1st for Bacteria Provisions of Water Quality

To All,

Please consider commenting on the State Water Board’s plan to protect state waters from bacteria pollution. Your comment can be a simple statement of concern or as detail as you want from reading the plan below or from other sources.

You can mail it by post to the address given below or by email,



NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) will receive public comments on the proposed Part 3 of the Water Quality Control Plan for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries of California—Bacteria Provisions and a Water Quality Standards Variance Policy and the Proposed Amendment to the Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters of California—Bacteria Provisions and a Water Quality Standards Variance Policy (hereafter Bacteria Provisions), and the Draft Staff Report, including the Draft Substitute Environmental Documentation, for the Bacteria Provisions (hereafter Staff Report).

NOTICE IS ADDITIONALLY HEREBY GIVEN that State Water Board staff will hold a staff workshop to provide the public an opportunity to discuss the Bacteria Provisions and the Staff Report. Discussion of the Bacteria Provisions primary elements will assist the public with formulating written comments and assist staff in appreciating the public’s comments. A quorum of Board members may be present; however, no Board action will be taken. The staff workshop will be:

1 Notice of Filing submitted under California Code of Regulations, title 23, section 3779.

Monday, July 10, 2017

9:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Joe Serna Jr. – CalEPA Headquarters Bldg. Sierra Hearing Room
1001 I Street, Second Floor Sacramento, CA 95814

At the staff workshop, staff will present information related to the Bacteria Provisions.

NOTICE IS ADDITIONALLY HEREBY GIVEN that the State Water Board will hold a public hearing to receive public input and comments on the Bacteria Provisions and the Staff Report. A quorum of the State Water Board may be present; however, no Board action will be taken. The public hearing will be:

Tuesday, July 18, 2017August 1, 2017 9:30 a.m.
Joe Serna Jr. – CalEPA Headquarters Bldg. Coastal Hearing Room
1001 I Street, Second Floor Sacramento, CA 95814

Additional information on the hearing in Sacramento can be found at the State Water Board’s website at


The Bacteria Provisions, if adopted, would apply to fresh, estuarine, and marine waters; include revised indicator organisms [Escherichia coli (E. coli) and enterococci]; establish a risk protection level; and include new bacteria water quality objectives for the protection of Water Contact Recreation (REC-1). The Bacteria Provisions also include elements necessary for bacteria control implementation including reference beach and natural source exclusion approaches, high flow suspensions, seasonal suspensions, and designation of Limited Water Contact Recreation (LREC-1). In addition, the Bacteria Provisions identify an existing mechanism for adopting water quality standards variances for pollutants and waterbodies.

Beneficial Use
A beneficial use definition for Limited Water Contact Recreation (LREC-1) waters is included in the Bacteria Provisions. This beneficial use definition recognizes that body contact is limited in a waterbody due to physical conditions, such as restricted access and very low water depths.

Water Quality Objectives
New statewide bacteria water quality objectives for REC-1 waters are needed to update the current bacteria objectives in Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Water Board) Basin Plans to be consistent with U.S. EPA’s 2012 Recreational Water Quality Criteria recommendations. The Bacteria Provisions will ensure that bacterial objectives for REC-1 waters are based on the most recent science and are consistently updated statewide.

The Program of Implementation
The Bacteria Provisions include the following implementation provisions within the context of a Total Maximum Daily Load:

  •   Reference System/Antidegradation approach.
  •   Natural Sources Exclusion approachThe Bacteria Provisions include policies supporting:
  •   High Flow Suspension of the REC-1 beneficial use.
  •   Seasonal Suspension of the REC-1 beneficial use.Water Quality Standards Variances
    The Bacteria Provisions identify the mechanism for adopting a variance to allow for additional implementation actions applicable to all pollutants and water segments consistent with 40 Code of Federal Regulations section 131.14.DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY

    The Bacteria Provisions, Staff Report, and other information will be available on the State Water Board’s website on June 26, 2017 June 30, 2017 at:

    You may request a paper copy of the proposed Bacteria Provisions by calling Stephanie Rose at (916) 341-5574 or via email at, Michael Gjerde at (916) 341-5283 or via email at, or Nick Martorano at (916) 341-5290 or via email at


    At the July 18th public hearing, there will be no sworn testimony or cross-examination of participants. However, the State Water Board and its staff may ask clarifying questions. At the hearing, participants will be given an opportunity to summarize and supplement their written materials with oral presentations. To ensure a productive and efficient hearing in which all participants have an opportunity to participate, oral presentations may be time-limited. For other presentation recommendations go to:

    The State Water Board will schedule a meeting subsequent to the public hearing at which it will consider adopting the Provisions.


    State Water Board staff will also accept input and recommendations through written comments. Written comments must be received no later than 12:00 noon on Friday, August 11, 2017 Wednesday, August 16, 2017 and addressed to:

    Jeanine Townsend, Clerk to the Board
    State Water Resources Control Board
    P.O. Box 100, Sacramento, CA 95812-2000 (mail)
    1001 I Street, 24th Floor, Sacramento, CA 95814 (hand-delivery)

Greater Farallones National Marine Sanctuary

You are receiving this email because in the past you have expressed interest in the expansion of the Greater Farallones National Marine Sanctuary. NOAA is soliciting comment on National Marine Sanctuaries and Marine National Monuments designated or expanded since April 28, 2007, during a 30-day public comment period, which opened on Monday, June 26, 2017. NOAA is seeking comments to assist the Secretary of Commerce in his review under Section 4(b) of the Presidential Executive Order (EO) 13795 “Implementing an America-First Offshore Energy Strategy” signed April 28, 2017. There are a total of six National Marine Sanctuaries and five Marine National Monuments under review (please see the table below).

​NOAA is asking for comments on the criteria outlined in Section 4(b)(i) of Executive Order 13795:

An analysis of the acreage affected and an analysis of the budgetary impacts of the costs of managing each National Marine Sanctuary or Marine National Monument designation or expansion;
An analysis of the adequacy of any required Federal, State and tribal consultations conducted before the designations or expansions; and
The opportunity costs associated with potential energy and mineral exploration and production from the Outer Continental Shelf, in addition to any impacts on production in the adjacent region.
You may submit comments identified by docket ID NOAA-NOS-2017-0066 by one of the following methods:
Electronic submissions: Beginning Monday, June 26, the option to submit all electronic public comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at enter NOAA-NOS-2017-0066 in the “Search” box, click the “Comment Now!” icon, complete the required fields, and enter or attach your comments.
Mail: EO 13795 Review, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring Metro Campus Building 4 (SSMC4), Eleventh Floor, 1305 East West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
​Thank you for your interest in the Greater Farallones National Marine Sanctuary. For more information, please visit the websites below or contact Willilam Douros (, 831-647-1920).
Office of National Marine Sanctuaries Website:
Federal Register Notice:

National Marine Sanctuaries and Marine National Monuments Under Review Pursuant to EO 13795, Sec. 4(b)

Maria Brown

Health of California’s Streams, Rivers, and Lakes

To All,

Are our streams and rivers healthy?  Below is a link to a government site that gives general and specific information on this subject with links to specific databases on California’s streams.


Save the date: Citizen lawsuit webinar on 6/27!

WHO: Speakers will include Heather Govern from the National Environmental Law Center and Whitey Markle from the Suwannee/St. Johns Sierra Club Group.

WHAT: An educational webinar on how to use the Clean Water Act to file and win a citizen lawsuit!

WHEN: Tentative date is Tuesday, 6/27. Time will be confirmed at a later date.

WHY: For environmental advocates to learn how to hold polluters accountable and win legal battles! The Clean Water Act has a provision that allows citizens to file lawsuits against polluters. Attend our webinar to learn how you can utilize this legal tool. The webinar will provide you with legal information, a recent example of a successful lawsuit, and the opportunity to connect with local advocate Whitey Markle.

Please feel free to share this event with your coalition members and RSVP here to receive login information for the webinar.

Response to Sapping the Well

To All,
Paso Robles has been dealing with heavy water issues also as many of you know. National Geographic is filming a great story of their area right now. Financiers/vulture capitalists have been buying up vineyards for the water rights, wine grapes are just the window dressing, and selling it back to the residents. The rush to construct vineyards there left many wells dried up and the huge vineyard owners drilled deeply which home owners could not afford to do. It caused a real estate downfall and the supervisors enacted a moratorium on irrigated vineyards for 2 years then extended for another year.

WWW (Wine & Water Watch) has this on their website,  View the video short, pretty shocking…. it could happen here in a heart beat. A few years of drought is all it takes.


Join “Enhancing Groundwater Recharge with Stormwater” May 30th

To All,

Join the California Water Boards for an engaging conversation on “Enhancing Groundwater Recharge with Stormwater” with Andrew T. Fisher, Professor of Earth and Planetary Sciences, UC Santa Cruz.

This event will be held on Tuesday, May 30, 2017 from 130pm to 230pm at 1001 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 (Klamath Room) and via webcast.

Stormwater is an under-utilized resource in California that has become increasingly important as demand for freshwater increases, land use and vegetation shifts, and precipitation becomes more intense.  The recent drought has exacerbated water management challenges in California, but has also provided rare opportunities through groundbreaking policy initiatives, such as the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act. Professor Fisher, along with his students and colleagues, seek to investigate the potential of stormwater to address California’s water management challenges through several projects related to Managed Aquifer Recharge.

“Enhancing Groundwater Recharge with Stormwater” is part of the Water Boards’ STORMS SEMINAR SERIES and is free to attend.

Additional information is available in the attached flier.

STORMS_speaker series5-30-2017-flier2

My Comments Regarding Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument Threat

To All,

I submitted these comments using the link provided in the previous posting on the threat to the Cascasde-Siskiyou National Monument.

In this time of Climate Change (many scientists would characterize this as Climate Crises and Global crises), we need to protect forests for its watersheds, fish, and air quality. This benefits agriculture and the community as well as all public trust issues. To do otherwise only benefits a narrow few with with short term profits that create downstream expense and destruction for everyone else.


Russian River Estuary/Low Flow Meeting, May 15, Monte Rio

Hi River Lovers!

There is a very important meeting this Monday night (May 15th) on the Estuary Project at the Monte Rio Community Center from 6 pm to 7:30.  Sonoma County Water Agency (SCWA) will give updates on their studies.  Supervisor Hopkins will also be there and the meeting will include time for public comment.  We hope you will attend; showing community interest is critical.

While the meeting is supposedly about the Estuary Project (maintenance of a sand bar to retain a closed mouth) it is ultimately about low flow also.  In order to try to sustain a closed mouth, low flow is the management tool to make it happen.  (The theory is the less water at the mouth, the less pressure there is for the sand bar to break open.)  The Water Agency has also claimed to be concerned about flooding properties in the Estuary that could force them to breach the river mouth.  The Estuary Project is only in effect between May 15 and October 15 and here are project facts not presented in local media and SCWA publicity:

• In the seven years of attempting this project, it has worked only once for one week (June 2010): for this we have paid with seven years of summer low flow.
• SCWA breaching and closure events (July-August only) are as follows:
• No July-August closures or breaches in years: 2001, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2011, 2014, and 2015.
• No August closures or breaches in years: 1999, 2008, 2010, 2012, 2013, 2016.  (Single August closure between 2001 and 2016 was in 2004.)
• SCWA breached the mouth in August only 3 times in 1995 and 1997 and none after that.
• July closures took place in 2004, 2008, 2010, 2012, 2013, and 2016 for a total of 44 days over 16 years (average of 2.75 per year). Of those years, only breach by SCWA was in 2008.
• Numerous times when flows were low (August, 2009 for instance) but mouth did not close.  Closures are usually a result of ocean conditions, not river conditions.

Some Biological Opinion (BO) assumptions about mouth activity may have been valid many years ago, but for the last 15-20 years, conditions appear to have changed and many of the BO assumptions are turning out to no longer be valid.  Yet they are invested in this low flow plan to our detriment.  We don’t know how this will end up, but we suggest you ask the Water Agency questions about July/August mouth closures, breachings, and flows.  Also ask what buildings have flooded in July/August in the last 20 years (We think the number is NONE!)

Finally, the Estuary Project DEIR clearly stated that SCWA can do the Estuary Project WITHOUT low flow.

Hope you can attend.  If you can’t go and want to send a note about your concerns and/or questions: contact Ann Dubay at   or me at email address below.

Hope to see you Monday night!   PLEASE PASS THE WORD!


Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument Threat and Action

Greetings to All,

Just hours ago, the Trump Administration formally started their process to gut protection for the spectacular Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument.

Help us protect the Monument! For this Monument and every other of the 27 monuments under attack by Trump, please take action now.

The Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument is a gem of biodiversity at the intersection of the Cascades, Siskiyous, and Klamath Mountains. The richness in species is without equal. It is a recreational haven for wildlife viewing and hiking, including a stretch of the Pacific Crest Trail. It is an important study area for scientists and students alike. For communities like Ashland and Talent, residents marvel at the lovely green mountains that surround our valley.

It is NOT a place for more industrial logging, mining, or drilling.

The Trump Administration claims there has been little local support the Monument. Hardly! Hundreds of residents turned out at multiple public meetings, and more than 4,000 sent in letters of support to the Department of Interior.

We need you to speak up for the Cascade-Siskiyou.

There’s a 60-day comment period to hear from supporters like you who want the Monument to remain protected.

The timber industry and their lobbyists are pushing to gut the Monument’s protection. The Trump Administration needs to hear from you, as someone who supports protecting public lands.

This is Trump’s first attack on the Klamath-Siskiyou. Let’s show him we can fight back, because we love where we live and will defend what we love. Please submit your comment letters and share this alert on social media.

We refuse to lose our Monument.

For the Wild,

Joseph Vaile, Executive Director
Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center

Re: Drought to Deluge

To All,

The “tunnel transportation solution” is simply another promotion for transporting more water from Norther California to Southern California. Jerry Brown is from Southern CA and the primary political clout in CA seems to reside in Southern CA.

Personally, I think it was a big mistake to reverse the water conservation measures that the State had imposed during the most recent drought period.

Before I moved out of San Jose, at least 75% of the neighbors on our street (and the adjoining streets in our neighborhood) let their lawns die and they converted to drought-tolerant plantings with drip irrigation.During my visits to LA I have not seen the same efforts to reduce their water consumption.

My opinion is that, in general, Southern CA thinks there is an unlimited bank of water from Northern CA that they are entitled to use since we are all part of CA.


Some folks like the tunnel transportation solution.  I’m not nearly so enthusiastic as some folks in the southland.


It is time to learn a lesson from these folks:  Every crisis is an opportunity.  Now is the moment to holler loud and clear “It is not the dam (damn) infrastructure, it is the transportation infrastructure that must be changed to avoid carbon dioxide pollution.”

Notice “California water officials have been discussing how warming will affect the state’s water system. Now some officials believe they will have to change the infrastructure — such as building or raising dams and constructing two giant tunnels underneath the confluence of the state’s two largest rivers — to deal with more precipitation falling as rain and snow melting more quickly.”

They never give up, do they?