Skip to content
California River Watch
  • Activist Corner
  • Climate Crisis
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Our Mission
    • Giving Back to the Community
    • Board of Directors
    • Annual Report
    • IRS Form 990
    • Articles of Incorporation
    • CRW Bylaws
    • FAQ
  • Cases
    • Current Cases
    • Resolved Cases
    • Settlement Compliance
    • Press Room
    • Laws and Regulations
  • Resources
    • CRW Comment Letters
    • Pesticides
    • Economic Actions
    • Action Calendar
    • Report Pollution
    • California Coastal Act Requirements
    • Government Contacts
    • Environmental Contacts
    • Fact Sheets
    • Maps
    • The Clean Water Act
  • Article Archive
  • Contact Us
California River Watch Header
Previous Next

Regarding SCWA’s Conservation in Water Plan

Posted on January 15, 2007 by Larry
Activist Corner, Groundwater Impacts, Streams and Wetlands Impacts, Waste Discharge Pollution

The SCWA says they have looked at conservation and reuse, yet their projected water use of 101,000 ac-ft did not decrease at all.

Len Holt

Post navigation

« Comment on SCWA’s Water Plan Response to PD Article and Editorial »

Recent Posts

  • CRW Comments on CA’s Hexavalent Chromium
  • New Netflix Climate Film: “YOUTH v GOV”
  • Supreme Court Reinstates Rules Limiting Clean Water Act Protections
  • Wetlands–Endangered!
  • Forest Service tool spotlights connection between forests and water

Links

  • Northern California River Watch v. City of Healdsburg, No. 04-15442 (9th Circuit Decision)
  • River Watch Wins Appeal on Hexavalent Chromium Contamination in Vacaville’s Water

Web sites

  • River Watch

Archives

Categories

Activist Corner Annual Report Clean Water Act Climate Crisis Coastal and Bay Impacts COVID-19 Drinking Water issues Fluoride pollution Food Agriculture Impacting Water Forest carbon accounting issues Fracking impacting water sources Global Warming/Climate Change Gravel Mining Impacting watershed Groundwater Impacts Homepage Featured Post Lakes and Resevoirs Impacts Logging Impacting watershed Main Article Archive Oil, Mining, and Gas Water Pollution Pesticide pollution Pharmaceutical Contamination Preservation Issue Salmonid/Wildlife Impacts Stormwater Impacts Streams and Wetlands Impacts Viticulture not food agriculture Impacts Waste Discharge Pollution Water Conservation Issue Watershed Related Concerns Wine/vineyard Impacts

Recent Posts

  • CRW Comments on CA’s Hexavalent Chromium
  • New Netflix Climate Film: “YOUTH v GOV”
  • Supreme Court Reinstates Rules Limiting Clean Water Act Protections
  • Wetlands–Endangered!
  • Forest Service tool spotlights connection between forests and water

Links

  • Northern California River Watch v. City of Healdsburg, No. 04-15442 (9th Circuit Decision)
  • River Watch Wins Appeal on Hexavalent Chromium Contamination in Vacaville’s Water

Copyright © 2002 – 2020 California River Watch