Skip to content
California River Watch
  • Activist Corner
  • Climate Crisis
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Our Mission
    • Giving Back to the Community
    • Board of Directors
    • Annual Report
    • IRS Form 990
    • Articles of Incorporation
    • CRW Bylaws
    • FAQ
  • Cases
    • Current Cases
    • Resolved Cases
    • Settlement Compliance
    • Press Room
    • Laws and Regulations
  • Resources
    • CRW Comment Letters
    • Pesticides
    • Economic Actions
    • Action Calendar
    • Report Pollution
    • California Coastal Act Requirements
    • Government Contacts
    • Environmental Contacts
    • Fact Sheets
    • Maps
    • The Clean Water Act
  • Article Archive
  • Contact Us
California River Watch Header
Previous Next

SWRCB’s Letter to SCWA’s Water Conservation Efforts

Posted on April 2, 2007 by Larry
Activist Corner, Groundwater Impacts, Streams and Wetlands Impacts, Waste Discharge Pollution

Here is the letter from State Water Rights Control Board to the Sonoma County Water Agency, Randy Poole, concerning SCWA’s conservation efforts in their plan.

–Larry

swrcb-requests-scwa-water-conservation-efforts-2-2-05.pdf

Post navigation

« SCWA’s Urban Watershed Management Plan 2002 RR Water Quality Testing Report and Endocrine Disruptors »

Recent Posts

  • California’s Forests Targeted As Feedstock for Global Wood Bioenergy Industry
  • The Biden administration has called for protecting mature US forests to slow climate change, but it’s still allowing them to be logged
  • DWR Delivers $143.7 Million to Local Communities to Address Regional Water Supply Challenges and Build Climate Resilience State
  • Separation and Analysis of Microplastics and Nanoplastics in Complex Environmental Samples
  • The Sky is Frying!

Links

  • Northern California River Watch v. City of Healdsburg, No. 04-15442 (9th Circuit Decision)
  • River Watch Wins Appeal on Hexavalent Chromium Contamination in Vacaville’s Water

Web sites

  • River Watch

Archives

Categories

Activist Corner Annual Report Clean Water Act Climate Crisis Coastal and Bay Impacts COVID-19 Drinking Water issues Fluoride pollution Food Agriculture Impacting Water Forest carbon accounting issues Fracking impacting water sources Global Warming/Climate Change Gravel Mining Impacting watershed Groundwater Impacts Homepage Featured Post Lakes and Resevoirs Impacts Logging Impacting watershed Main Article Archive Oil, Mining, and Gas Water Pollution Pesticide pollution Pharmaceutical Contamination Preservation Issue Salmonid/Wildlife Impacts Stormwater Impacts Streams and Wetlands Impacts Viticulture not food agriculture Impacts Waste Discharge Pollution Water Conservation Issue Watershed Related Concerns Wine/vineyard Impacts

Recent Posts

  • California’s Forests Targeted As Feedstock for Global Wood Bioenergy Industry
  • The Biden administration has called for protecting mature US forests to slow climate change, but it’s still allowing them to be logged
  • DWR Delivers $143.7 Million to Local Communities to Address Regional Water Supply Challenges and Build Climate Resilience State
  • Separation and Analysis of Microplastics and Nanoplastics in Complex Environmental Samples
  • The Sky is Frying!

Links

  • Northern California River Watch v. City of Healdsburg, No. 04-15442 (9th Circuit Decision)
  • River Watch Wins Appeal on Hexavalent Chromium Contamination in Vacaville’s Water

Copyright © 2002 – 2020 California River Watch