FYI–Workshop is on June 19 but written comments are due June 6. See below on more details for both ways of commenting.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC WORKSHOP
The State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) will hear comments that will inform its policy direction on water right enforcement, including enforcement for violation of water right permit terms and conditions and for unauthorized diversion or use of water.
MATTERS FOR DISCUSSION IN THE WORKSHOP
The purpose of the workshop is to receive comments from water right stakeholders concerning the Division’s water right enforcement program. The following issues are identified to focus comments and discussions on water right enforcement.
• Should the State Water Board adopt enforcement provisions in its AB 2121 policy?
• Should the State Water Board adopt an enforcement policy for areas of the state that are outside the mandated geographic scope of the AB 2121 policy? If the State Water Board adopts an enforcement policy that applies to other areas of the state, should it contain the same enforcement provisions as the AB 2121 policy?
• How should the State Water Board set enforcement priorities? What factors should it consider in setting enforcement priorities?
• Currently the State Water Board’s Division of Water Rights (Division) identifies one or more watersheds per year in which it will conduct compliance inspections. In the past, watersheds have been selected after consultation with the Regional Water Quality Control Boards, the California Department of Fish and Game, and federal fishery agencies. The Division selects the watershed(s) on which it will focus its enforcement resources based on potential impacts to water quality and aquatic resources. The Division then conducts both investigations of unauthorized diversions and compliance inspections of permitted and licensed water supply projects within the selected watershed(s). Should the State Water Board continue to focus its water right enforcement resources on specific watersheds? If so, how should those watersheds be selected? If not, what other basis should be used?
• Should the State Water Board provide an opportunity for voluntary compliance or corrective actions before initiating formal enforcement actions and, if so, under what circumstances? How long a time should the State Water Board allow for voluntary compliance?
• The State Water Board has pending over 500 water right applications. Many of these applications were filed to seek authorization for existing, but unauthorized, water supply projects. Should the State Water Board initiate enforcement against existing applicants that are diverting water without authorization? Under what conditions should the State Water Board initiate enforcement actions against these applicants?
• The State Water Board has pending over 600 petitions to change existing water right permits or licenses. Many of these petitions were filed to seek authorization for changes in place or purpose of use or point of diversion that have already taken place without seeking the required prior approval of the change from the State Water Board. Should the State Water Board initiate enforcement against existing petitioners that are diverting water in violation of the conditions of their water right permits or licenses? Under what conditions should the State Water Board initiate enforcement actions against these petitioners?
• The State Water Board has four potential formal enforcement options available: (1) issuance of a Cease and Desist Order, (2) issuance of an Administrative Civil Liability (monetary penalty), (3) referral of the matter to the Attorney General for fines or injunction or both, and (4) revocation of a permit or license. In some cases, a violation may result in only one type of action, and in other cases, a violation could result in more than one type of action. What conditions should be present before the State Water Board considers imposing each of the potential enforcement options?
• If a Cease and Desist Order is determined to be appropriate, should the State Water Board provide an opportunity in the Cease and Desist Order for the recipient of the order to continue to divert water while coming into compliance? If so, what conditions and time schedule for compliance should the State Water Board impose? What other factors should the State Water Board consider in determining a reasonable time schedule for compliance to be included in any Cease and Desist Order?
• Under what circumstances, if any, should a Cease and Desist Order require the permanent removal of an illegal diversion facility?
• The State Water Board has the authority to issue Administrative Civil Liability (ACL) of up to $500 per day of unauthorized diversion and use or up to $1000 per day for violation of a Cease and Desist Order. If an ACL complaint is deemed appropriate, how should the monetary penalty be calculated in order to ensure that the monetary penalty is effective in compelling compliance with water right law? What factors should the State Water Board consider in setting the amount of the monetary penalty?
• What factors should the State Water Board consider when determining whether to refer a violation to the Office of the Attorney General for prosecution?
• What factors should the State Water Board consider when determining whether to revoke a water right permit or license as a result of violation of permit or license terms?
• The State Water Board has the authority to revoke water right permits and licenses if the water right fees due on the permit or license are not paid for five or more years. Should the State Water Board consider revoking water right permits and licenses for failure to pay water right fees? If so, under what conditions should the permit or license be revoked?
• The State Water Board has authority to cancel a pending application if the applicant does not diligently act to acquire a permit. Should the State Water Board cancel an illegal water supply project for lack of diligence by the applicant? Under what conditions should the State Water Board cancel a pending application for an illegal water supply project?
• Are there any other factors that the State Water Board should consider in regard to water right enforcement?
The workshop will be informal. There will be no sworn testimony or cross-examination of participants, but the State Water Board and its staff may ask clarifying questions.
Participants should submit written comments prior to the workshop. At the workshop, participants will be given an opportunity to summarize and supplement their written materials with oral presentations. To ensure a productive and efficient workshop, and to ensure that all participants have an opportunity to participate, oral presentations may be given time limits. Participants with similar comments are requested to make joint presentations.
Workshop to Receive Information Regarding Policy Direction on Water Right Enforcement Tuesday, June 19, 2007 at the conclusion of the regularly scheduled Board Meeting and no sooner than 1:00 p.m.
Joe Serna, Jr./Cal-EPA Building
Coastal Hearing Room
1001 I Street
Participants are requested to provide written comments by 12:00 noon on Wednesday, June 6, 2007. When submitting preliminary comments, the State Water Board requests that an original and ten hard copies, plus one electronic copy be sent to:
Song Her, Clerk to the Board
State Water Resources Control Board
1001 I Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
Written comments and electronic presentations are to be submitted to the Clerk to the Board via email at email@example.com. Please indicate in the subject line: “Water Right Enforcement Workshop.”