Skip to content
California River Watch
  • Activist Corner
  • Climate Crisis
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Our Mission
    • Giving Back to the Community
    • Board of Directors
    • Annual Report
    • IRS Form 990
    • Articles of Incorporation
    • CRW Bylaws
    • FAQ
  • Cases
    • Current Cases
    • Resolved Cases
    • Settlement Compliance
    • Press Room
    • Laws and Regulations
  • Resources
    • CRW Comment Letters
    • Pesticides
    • Economic Actions
    • Action Calendar
    • Report Pollution
    • California Coastal Act Requirements
    • Government Contacts
    • Environmental Contacts
    • Fact Sheets
    • Maps
    • The Clean Water Act
  • Article Archive
  • Contact Us
California River Watch Header
Previous Next

Russian River Frost Protection Update

Posted on June 13, 2010 by Larry
Activist Corner, Food Agriculture Impacting Water, Salmonid/Wildlife Impacts, Streams and Wetlands Impacts


This is a message from the State Water Resources Control Board.
_______________________________________________________________
Attached is the agenda for the June 15, 2010 Board meeting, where staff will present a Russian River Frost Protection Update (Item 10 on the agenda). This is an informational item only.

Post navigation

« Webinar on The Ecology of Benthic Macroinvertebrates One-Day Sonoma Valley Groundwater Tour, June 18 »

Recent Posts

  • What Does West Virgina v. EPA mean for Climate Action
  • Forest research links carbon uptake and water use
  • Vacaville can’t be held responsible for polluted water, court rules
  • California River Watch’s Response
  • California’s drought means less water to go around. Who is winning the pursuit for water — and who is losing?

Links

  • Northern California River Watch v. City of Healdsburg, No. 04-15442 (9th Circuit Decision)
  • River Watch Wins Appeal on Hexavalent Chromium Contamination in Vacaville’s Water

Web sites

  • River Watch

Archives

Categories

Activist Corner Annual Report Clean Water Act Climate Crisis Coastal and Bay Impacts COVID-19 Drinking Water issues Fluoride pollution Food Agriculture Impacting Water Forest carbon accounting issues Fracking impacting water sources Global Warming/Climate Change Gravel Mining Impacting watershed Groundwater Impacts Homepage Featured Post Lakes and Resevoirs Impacts Logging Impacting watershed Main Article Archive Oil, Mining, and Gas Water Pollution Pesticide pollution Pharmaceutical Contamination Preservation Issue Salmonid/Wildlife Impacts Stormwater Impacts Streams and Wetlands Impacts Viticulture not food agriculture Impacts Waste Discharge Pollution Water Conservation Issue Watershed Related Concerns Wine/vineyard Impacts

Recent Posts

  • What Does West Virgina v. EPA mean for Climate Action
  • Forest research links carbon uptake and water use
  • Vacaville can’t be held responsible for polluted water, court rules
  • California River Watch’s Response
  • California’s drought means less water to go around. Who is winning the pursuit for water — and who is losing?

Links

  • Northern California River Watch v. City of Healdsburg, No. 04-15442 (9th Circuit Decision)
  • River Watch Wins Appeal on Hexavalent Chromium Contamination in Vacaville’s Water

Copyright © 2002 – 2020 California River Watch